There’s been an observation which was pounded into my head many years ago that has led to some unique insights in my life, and that observation has been –

“There are no right answers to the wrong questions.”

This means if no legitimate answers will ever be forthcoming, no matter how many times or the manner in which the question was asked, then the question itself must be changed. All too often we subconsciously insist on remaining stuck in a loop, blindly convincing ourselves we are not in a flawed environment and thinking that if we explore long enough, an exit will present itself.

Now, there is another philosophy I also turn to when looking for life’s solutions, and it involves changing one of the worst questions anyone can ever ask which is, “How can I please everyone?” It’s universally agreed that this path is a dead end, but this doesn’t stop vast numbers from foolishly pursuing what is obviously an impossible task. Not only is it massively unrealistic to even contemplate, I think it’s next to unachievable to even please a majority of people. How then must the original question be altered so that a viable outcome presents itself? If pleasing everyone is completely nonrealistic endeavor, then how’s this for the next best alternative, “Is it possible to piss off everyone equally?” I’ll bet after you’re done laughing a light bulb will start to go off. Here’s the logic of this approach. If it is indeed possible to take an issue and come up with a solution that pretty much upsets everyone on both sides of the aisle, then that solution has strangely caused balance between opposing forces.

I’ll let that sink in for a second…

With this new methodology in mind, let’s apply it to the hottest topic in the United States right now, gun control. First off, for the Love of God, stop calling it “gun control.” It’s insulting right out of the gate, and nobody who owns one is going to align with the idea of being “controlled.” I suppose we could say “There’s no right reaction to the wrong tactic” which is damn close to asking a wrong question to begin with. So, before we go any further, let’s find another more agreeable and sensible headline to the issue. How about calling the topic at hand “firearm responsibility”? Does that sound both less aggressive and more on point? For one, almost everyone thinks being responsible is proper behavior, and personally I prefer the term firearm instead of gun because it’s more descriptive of the function of the item. There’s power and purpose in communicating the correct vernacular, so this step is vital.

Eliminating guns in the United States is, for the moment, folly, therefore pointless and a waste of time and energy. There’s way too much push back from those who both own and manufacture these items. On the other hand the fact that there are approximately two and a half guns for every man, woman, and child in the country (816 million…) is a horrifying realization to those who are uninterested in personal use or ownership. Before we delve further into the subject, let’s look at the law that allows arms.

The Second Amendment says this –

“A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”

Here is where we come to an idea which will piss off everyone when a solution to the clash between those who favor and those who oppose, is sought. Here is where we finally reinforce the first four words of the Second Amendment. On one side are gun owners who insist on keeping their guns. On the other side are people who insist on disarming potential threats. Here’s an idea that will do BOTH at the same time…

Let’s put high regulations on the type of AMMO people can buy.

You want to keep target shooting? Fine, you qualify for all the non-lethal bullets or cartridges you want. You’re a hunter? Okay, you qualify for rounds that will do the job for you, however, the shells will be marked with a lot number and when you want more, you’ll need to turn in a certain spent percentage to get more. Does this sound drastic? Does it allow guns to stay in the hands of gun owners? Does it violate the Second Amendment? Does it bother you that no one will be forced to give up their arms? Does it make you mad just reading this? Good… because here is where we will start building respect for the rights of those we disagree with, which is the real problem un this country right now.

I’m well aware, and actually agree with the observation often repeated by advocates that “Guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” The same can be said about… vehicles. Approximately two thirds of the people in the United States have driver’s licenses. That’s a big percentage when you eliminate the numbers of elderly and underaged. In any case, as responsible citizens, we are in agreement nationwide that those who get behind the wheel (private properties not included here) are required to have passed an aptitude test before they are allowed on public roads. Not only that, if they comply with the law, they are ALSO required to carry insurance so that those who are victims of all manner of accidents have safeguards in place for situations of irresponsibly or unforeseen incidents. It’s also well known that if you drive more complicated and larger vehicles, then a certificate proving increased competence is required along with higher insurance rates. Now, do people indeed drive without either licensing or insurance? Of course, happens all the time. Laws don’t keep criminals from conducting illegal actions, but that’s not the point. Here’s the REAL point. Would the elimination of both licensing and insurance for drivers also lead to an increase of highly irresponsible behavior including a huge jump in the death rate on the roads of our nation? What a stupid question. We have laws in effect because it’s agreed upon by EVERYONE that the absence of said laws would lead to total chaos, so do me a favor, keep this argument in mind the next time you spout “guns don’t kill people, people kill people.” If we approach firearm ownership with the same sensibilities as we do vehicles, then does this not now bring into focus as well as enforcement those first four words, “A well-regulated Militia…”? 

And by the way, one more thing…

The idea we have “rights” is not what most think it is. The truth of the matter is ALL rights, even if they are given, are kept by earning them. The reason this is true is because the opposite is true, all rights can be lost. How? Through irresponsible behavior of course. Jails and prisons are full of people who are proof of this observation. Gun ownership is no different because no one would agree with the notion that irresponsible people should have access to lethal methods of solving problems or expressing themselves.

Have fun arguing this solution because in the end, we’ll all end up on the same side because of it.

Please follow my blog, comment and share as you wish.

With Love and Compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood



Books, in tactile form, are still quite abundant. Both fiction and nonfiction titles sell in the traditional paper-bound format, though admittedly not as much as they used to. These days the internet and e-readers represent the majority of what we read, BUT the content is never diminished just because of where and how we view it. Not only that, books have staying power. They get resold, placed on shelves for later reference and entertainment, and they have long and loving tradition of being loaned out through the world’s library systems.

Not so with newspapers.

Newspapers, unlike books, have always existed as a temporary and (mostly) daily reflection of our rapidly changing world. They were never meant to be hoarded nor readily referenced.  Perhaps not always truthful or objective, they are, however, capable and experienced at informing us in ways no other media can. Local stories that would have possibly gone unnoticed have often changed things in a big way, at the very least in the lives of individuals. I know they have for me.

I once read that the average New York Times paper (from the eighties) would take over a week of solid twenty-four an hour a day broadcasting if it were presented on television in the way the nightly news was. This would mean whatever would have been chosen to be televised, no matter what its intent might have been, the content would’ve come across as shallow at best. My memory might be off here, but I do recall this as being accurate. If it is, wow. Granted, a good portion of the programming would be fluff and advertising, but it’s still undeniable evidence of what we are missing out on for the average news story. Deeper facts and viewpoints are taking a back seat these days for more superficial, less exact, (and more quickly judged) stories.

I do not believe we have outgrown the desire for viewing and appreciating the full picture. What we’ve collectively done is become the drones of the corporate world. Shorter and faster information equals quicker decisions, quicker reactions, and more spending. There is a logic to this, but only from the perspective of those who have the power to begin with.

There’s a way to turn things around, but it must be done quickly or the time of action will pass us by. I say if we want better news AND we want to save our newspapers then they have to stop selling them.

The answer is –



Does this sound like a suicidal move? I think not, and here’s why.

Sunday has always sold the most newspapers. Why? It’s been the same reason for decades, advertising. People don’t hate advertising as long as they can do it at a leisurely pace. Television, however, forces ads upon us. We either have to mute the sound, change the channel, or patiently sit through them until our program resumes, not so with newspapers. If we want to look, we do, if not, we don’t. We’re always looking for a good deal and let’s face it, browsing the latest online ad from our favorite store kind of sucks. Ads in papers do not interfere with story content. Newspapers do NOT make most of their money through subscriptions, they make most of their money from selling advertising space, or at least they used to. If they want to raise the rates of ads and attract higher profits, then all they have to do is prove an increase of readership to justify raising the cost. If newspapers were free, people would pick them up with their morning coffee. Everyone loves to read. Just because it’s on the net doesn’t mean otherwise.

The other, and far more valuable asset fading away with the paper is the investigative reporter. While they do indeed still exist, it’s obvious their assets, presence, and power have been diminished simply because those who used to foot the payroll of these “news” detectives simply don’t exist anymore. All of us want to know the truth of a story and the longer, more  researched, and referenced it is, the more  credibility and power it can wield. I think all of us hunger for a more mentally nutritional source of information in this world of increasing fake information, sensational headlines, and thinly masked paid articles from those with interests that are strictly for profit. All of us (I assume) have at one point clicked on a story only to find out it’s sponsored by those who stand to benefit from our reaction to their agendas. Our corporate world realized a long time ago that fear sells, and if they can frighten us, we will throw our money at false solutions to made up problems.

Time to take a stand.

Truth should always be free, because in the end falsehoods will cost us our souls.


Who knows if my plea will be heard? Share this if you like, I certainly have no agenda for profit here.

Please follow my blog, comment and share as you wish

With Love and compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood



hands“Teachers lead while learners follow.” Observing and understanding this is not only valuable, but useful. In my opinion both paths are of equal importance. If there isn’t balance between the two, then our potential cannot be realized. Both skills must be stretched and practiced if we are to manifest progress in the direction of our dreams. In my dictionary the word describing the willingness to learn is “humility” while the best fit for teaching would be “tolerance.” The combination of the two equals “determination.”

In the United States we have a system that pumps out learners by the millions. Some have this skill down quite well by the time they don the cap and gown; others shun the idea of being seen as part of an antiquated and neglected system. In any case the other side of the equation is severely lacking; we do not spend nearly enough time teaching others how to teach.

teach_learnLearning is absorbed in reactionary form. Teaching is presented through action. When we reach forward with humility, asking for guidance and help from those we wish to align with, while at the same moment reaching back with an attitude of tolerance to offer those seeking encouragement and experience, we strengthen the chain of humanity. I’ve felt for a long time now that one of my primary goals in life is to find someone to replace me. This requires me to pass on what I know as well as what I feel. 

Perhaps this chain of humanity has been staring at us for a long time now, but no one has bothered to connect the links. I say we require students with higher grades to tutor those with lower grades. Not only that, but make this ACTION one that crosses the borders of grade levels as well. A fourth grader who struggled with reading in first grade, and now does well, would then have motive and experience to help another younger student in a similar position. The teacher in charge of the older or more informed pupil would have the responsibility of supervision and making sure the lesson would proceed with tolerance and patience on the part of the higher educated student. This action would then get evaluated just as any other subject would. The approach doesn’t even need to be all that deeply involved or strenuous. If it’s just an anchoring point to habits that can be expanded later in life, then the effort should be well worth it.

I honestly hope you don’t have common ground with how the system treated me. I remember thinking most of what was being shoved my direction was pointless. It was a burden to absorb and then quickly forgotten. Other than the occasional whipping I endured for anything below a “C” there was little motive for good grades, at least in my personal life. Luckily that wasn’t too often. If a program of reward other than a letter was in place during my days in the classroom, I might have found more motivation. When we help others we find the root of purpose.

To be honest I’ll be 51 soon and obviously a long time away from public school. We also don’t have children, so that distances me even further from the problem. There may indeed be such a program out there similar to what’s been laid out here. If there are, I, and everyone I’ve ever talked to, are unaware of it. I have indeed looked for evidence of one, but found nothing yet.

Teacher MemeThere’s no doubt that teachers today are overworked, over-blamed, and under-appreciated. They are in no way responsible for unacceptable behavior from students, yet society has pushed more and more for an image that equals a surrogate parent rather than an instructor. If we want a strong future from our children, then we must shift the responsibilities of how information is presented and absorbed. A passion to learn (and teach, of course) is NOT bred in school, it’s practiced in school. The roots of encouragement in both directions are (generally) watered at home. Although they try, teachers can only do so much to leverage interest. If students began teaching and sharing between each other with an enthusiasm encouraged by their parents, this might free the educator to involve themselves more personally with those individuals who need it most.

If what’s missing from most the human experience is compassion, understanding, empathy, composure, and humility then I see no reason this program would not eventually fill the void now occupied by selfishness, judgement, indifference, impatience, and arrogance.

Please follow my blog. Share and comment as you wish.

With Love and Compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood


no-texting-while-driving (1)

People debate the topic, but I’ve heard few, if any, solutions. After doing some quick research online I’ve found the top reason for automobile accidents is, obviously, distracted driving. Within this rather broad category texting ranks at the top, radio and personal audio devices come in at number two, and the fifth is eating. Not to put to put my neck in the noose, but I’m guilty of all three, though texting I’ve kept to stop lights. 😉

While there are laws designed to address the issue, they do little to deter those determined to keep up the habit. I drive a lot, and most people (yes, I really do mean more than half) I pass or glance at are preoccupied with handheld devices. I suppose technology will eventually perfect the ease of use with voice commands, but what do we do in the meantime?

So, at the risk of pissing off a lynching party, here is my proposal. I feel a failsafe device could be installed that does two things. One- If pressure and heat aren’t registered in two places on the steering wheel for less than say, ten seconds, then a loud annoying alarm sounds in the cab. Two- All the outside lights begin to rapidly flash letting other motorists know what the offending driver is doing. Yea, I can hear the crowds groaning in opposition already, but I think I can solve their objection to the idea.

Don’t make it mandatory, offer it as either an option or as required by the courts; more on that a little later. If installed, the rates in insurance might drop dramatically, especially for young drivers. This wouldn’t be for everyone, that’s for sure. Many, including myself, like to drive using only one hand, but we are talking about a severe solution to an even more severe problem.

Our vehicles are packed with safety features. To those just beginning drive at the turn of the century some6b1ef39acddee577aad6affd4c0c0389 one-hundred and fifteen years ago airbags, back-up lights, turn signals, seat belts, electric starters, anti-lock brakes, and even windshield wipers would probably come across to those folks as overwhelming, expensive, and unnecessary.  Even today most use most, and a few reject a few. Heck, all of us know someone who still refuses to wear their seatbelts.

Let’s say there’s a driver who has been in multiple incidents where texting was an issue. Perhaps the courts would allow leniency to this individual if they were to install this device on their vehicle. Don’t forget, breathalyzers that will disable the starting system if an elevated alcohol content is detected ARE installed in some cases by court order to monitor and offer some freedom to people who must drive to earn a living. Extreme? You bet, but it IS a solution, at least for the moment. And let’s face it, how hard would it really be to get used to using both hands on the steering wheel if it meant lower insurance bills and in some cases keeping your driver’s license? This seems to be a rather small price to pay in the long run.


I envision a locking battery-powered steering wheel cover that sends a remote signal to the lighting system of the car in use. The interior alarm would also be connected in the same fashion. There’s no way our technology can’t come up with a relatively inexpensive and easy to install  setup.

Those who own and run commercial fleets might want to maintain even more discipline from their drivers using this idea. Let’s face it, they already have the options of speed governing controls and GPS tracking.

I’m open-minded to other solutions but I haven’t heard anything past writing more laws. If you’ve got another idea I’d love to hear it.

Please follow my blog. Comment and share as you wish.

With Love and Compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood

Please feel free to visit my other blog dedicated to Recovery and Self-Help for beginners at


OIL2 (1)

Our world runs on oil. Almost everything that moves uses it at some level not to mention the millions of by-products it’s essential for. It’s a juggernaut for the moment, but time will inevitably slow this seemingly unstoppable force simply because the resource is unsustainable. We will eventually run out. In the meantime we continue to pollute our homes and the environment through constant overwhelming use. We look the other way because oil is readily available and everything we do and own depends on it.

Without transportation a vast number of us would be thrown into a primitive and threatening lifestyle. As we would inevitably step backwards from this convenience I’m sure crime rates would skyrocket, health problems would escalate, famine would sweep the planet, and so on. Oil is the first domino in the planet’s economy. Once pushed every other “domino” would fall. If we are to avert this coming crisis we must turn towards new (and less destructive) forms of energy. In my opinion the future belongs to hydrogen. As it stands now it costs more to capture and store the gas than it does to use it. In other words, more energy goes into creating it than utilizing it, at least for the moment.

I just MIGHT have an answer to this hurdle. It will take a lot of cooperation from a lot of parties, but in the long run it should provide an answer where once was only questions.

Producing hydrogen from water is a relatively simple process. No need to go into too many details here other than to say a water source and an electric current is necessary along with a way to capture and store it.


I few years ago I did some work at NREL here in Golden, Colorado. For those who have not heard of this facility NREL stands for National Renewable Energy Laboratory. I was working on a simple project, it was nothing fancy and I’m sure I can’t say anything more about my duties. During my work I stopped one of the scientists and asked a few questions about my idea. This is what I pitched.

“Is it feasible to hook an electrically run hydrogen conversion and storage set-up to the grey water (sewage waste without solids) of a given structure so the gas can then be used in the vehicles associated with the same building? I don’t see why the necessary power for the mechanics can’t be provided by a combination solar/wind set-up on the roof. The vehicles would be designed to simply pull into a designated space and re-fueled automatically from below.” I had even drawn up some sketches to explain my point a bit easier. “In my opinion we should go to the current power companies and ask them to build and maintain the systems for a monthly fee so they would not have their assets threatened by another form of energy. I don’t think it should be free, that’s for sure, so why not urge those with both the capital and incentive to begin with to try this?”

He seemed genuinely intrigued by the idea. Hydrogen,  I was told, is quite caustic and storage can be tricky. The tanks need changing from time to time because of it. I suggested lining them with a strip of something that would deteriorate faster than what it’s constructed of. This could let the home or business owner know it’s time to swap out for a new one. We discussed a few more kinks and he went about his way. The one thing I have no idea about is just how much hydrogen must be pumped into a vehicle to make it worthwhile. I’m sure it can be compressed (not necessarily to a liquid form) so it can hold more than normal atmospheric conditions would, but I have no idea if it could go two hundred feet or two hundred miles. My guess is a range of at least one-hundred and fifty miles would be demanded by the consumer.


I’m well aware where water (and wind or sunshine) is scarce this is a bad idea. What we use now is cleaned at our sewage treatment systems and eventually released back into the environment; usually a river. A drop in the outgoing volume might mean disaster for those downstream who rely on it. Perhaps we could pay for water to supply the fuel? In turn this money could be used to run desalination plants and cover the cost of replenishing what’s being used. There are no doubt many obstacles to overcome as well as an expected amount of opposition from naysayers, but I’m sure the essence of the idea is sound.

I’m also well aware the same idea can be used to power electric cars. Set up the wind/solar system to feed current power grids and then use the household A/C to “fuel” the car. I would even go so far as to suggest creating the same parking set-up where the owner simply pulls into a modified space and is automatically charged. My argument is the power and torque electrical vehicles currently deliver do not (yet) equal what an internal combustion engine can.

Even if this entire idea is illogical to those who have a higher understanding of mechanics, there is another part of the bigger picture that might make sense to people.

Please read on……..

This might be a bit of a pipe dream, but I feel the very best place on planet Earth to develop and cultivate new green technologies is……..Detroit. Just because the automotive industry is no longer the giant it once was doesn’t mean someone or something can’t step in and make use of the vast unused utility networks left behind from those who abandoned them. It sprang into existence because it’s a port city. easily connected to both the nation it sits in and the rest of the world. I see no reason to not at least entertain the idea. Surely there are silent factories and unused tracts of land just waiting for such an opportunity, and there’s little doubt the native population would cheer and embrace the revitalization of a once powerful metropolis. Just a thought.

Please follow my blog. Comment and share as you wish.

With Love and Compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood



I’m tired

I’m tired of a world fueled by fear. Does everyone really want to kill everyone else? Are we filled with hate and nothing but an instinct for self-preservation?

I don’t believe it. Not for a minute. We’re too rare, we’re too unique a species; and yes, we’re all only one species, human. Even with all Earth’s conflicts through the ages we’re still progressing, we’re still here; we still help each other more than hurt each other. It may not seem that way when violent images and ratings rule the media, but I refuse to believe in a future that indicates nothing but our degeneration as a race. Earth without us makes no sense to me and I’m willing to bet you agree.

War seems to be the answer more than it should and I doubt anyone would disagree with that. I do not dispute people must protect what they believe in and occasionally come to the aid of those too weak to survive without help. I do not support war as an answer, but there are times where it is unavoidable, especially when it is of a reactionary nature.


Consider the solitary soldier. Why does he or she join to begin with? Is it to fight? For some, perhaps, but I believe the majority genuinely want to do their part to help make the world a better place; and here is where I feel we can do something to truly make a difference.

I’m well aware, at least here in the United States, of our military engaging in humanitarian missions. We provide food where there is hunger, medicine where there is disease, and shelter where there is disaster. This, in my opinion, should be the main goal of our message through the “uniform.”

So many of our veterans come home after serving and find themselves at a loss. I’m sure they seek new ways to follow through on whatever set of skills they’ve worked so hard to develop. I’m equally sure they want to keep living the principles and values now a part of their persona. All too often these needs are simply unattainable. As a result some turn to drugs and alcohol, some turn inward, and some simply give up on living. What a waste. What I propose just might solve this crisis and in turn vastly improve our role on this planet.

I feel we need a new a new branch of the military; one that accepts only veterans from other branches, and one that has a goal of zero conflict. I propose we call this new branch of our forces……..

THE OLIVE BRANCH        olive_branch


If peace is what everyone wants, why not create a massive peace force? Think of it as a gigantic version of the Peace Corps, one that’s highly funded, pre-trained, and deeply organized. Here our veterans might find a new purpose and our reputation just might start to change globally. Perhaps we may come to re-define our place in history. I’m sure those who are willing to re-enlist will have the training (as well as the proper mindset) necessary to cope with adjusting to lifestyles and cultures wherever a crisis may take them.  I have already talked to a few veterans about this idea and the response is remarkable.

There’s no doubt this would be a massive undertaking. I am no organizer of such events, but here lies the seed of a new world. Do I think this is a republican or democratic idea? Do I think this is a liberal or conservative concept? I don’t care. It’s just an idea, and that’s it.

Our heroes deserve a future beyond facing the enemy. They deserve a future beyond constantly preparing for an attack. What they really deserve is a life filled with an opportunity to fulfill a destiny that includes hope and purpose for as long as they wish. Why not give these people the gift of continuing their service as long as they shall be willing to do so? Why not give ourselves this gift? What a wonderful world it would be if we could hand those willing to make it better the means to do so.

My suggestion to this branch would be to structure the “tours” differently so our men and women can enjoy a family life approaching something a bit more normal; perhaps sixty days on duty and thirty off. In any case I think it would only be fair to allow those willing to serve in this capacity the ability to enjoy a more peaceful personal existence as well.

If this idea resonates with you, pass it on and ask others to as well. I seek nothing in return. All of history has been written by small groups, and even single individuals who had an enthusiasm for not giving up on what they believed in. Don’t think you can’t help make a difference; you can.  There is a very famous saying attributed to Victor Hugo that sums up nicely how I feel.



Please follow this blog, comment and share as you wish.

With Love and Compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood






I Want your help on this. It WILL work. It WILL help thousands, and the only cost to you will be the willingness to pass this idea to others. I ask nothing in return.


Most of us want good, long-lasting, well-paying jobs. We all want a source of income where we can fuel our need for creative expression while at the same time sustaining a place of comfort and safety away from work. We are sorely in need of job reform (at least here in the United States) and I think I have just the answer to the creation of thousands upon thousands of jobs at little to no cost to taxes or by harming the income of those already working.

Don’t believe me? Read on………..


According to some quick research done on the net, the original overtime laws were put into effect a long time ago; 1938 to be exact. Here’s what most people don’t realize about how overtime works. Let’s say you’re making twenty dollars an hour and go 13 hours 20 minutes past your standard 40 work week, your take-home paycheck will then reflect an increase of 50%, give or take a little depending on how certain deductions are set up. In any case, the cost to the employer is NOT another 50% of your value to the company. Why? Because all of your perks or benefits such as insurances (medical, unemployment, etc.), vacation, sick days, and so on are already covered in the first 100%. Where you may see an extra 400.00 dollars on your end, my understanding is the employer only sees his costs rise about 35%. Painful? Yes, but not all that much, especially when considering the potential experience behind the output.

When the economy takes a dive, and I’ve seen this several times in my life now, several things commonly happen. In order to keep businesses running, companies will get rid of the under-qualified and overpaid. Unfortunately this also means those who are left probably should have had a raise long before this scenario. Once a portion of business is lost they will do what they can to recoup those losses. In order to make sure a reliable workforce capable manning new projects remains intact they MUST keep a certain core of qualified, motivated people. “Bridge” jobs and buying work is common so these people can be of use later when the labor force demands true growth, In the mean time the next step is to use who they have kept to cover for those they let go by working them very often past 50 or even 60 hours or more a week. Smart? Maybe at first, but when these employees lose some of their home time to work it will eventually put a strain on the quality of both lifestyles. When genuine fatigue and other factors come into play we are looking at possible on site injuries, drug use, a lack of motivation, and loss of customer service; so ultimately the system will begin to break down.

Here’s where job creation comes into the picture.

Change the laws. It’s just that simple…………

New-Laws EQUAL………..raining-money

I say we make a new law that says anything worked past 50 hours a week,




Seriously, if you’re making 10 hours a week overtime, you’re probably doing fair; and YES, I’m aware this is a wide judgement, especially if you are at the bottom of the wage scale, but for the moment I’m sticking with this opinion. Few would argue that working past fifty hours in any seven-day period cuts into getting the laundry done not to mention, social, family, and spiritual activities along with just time to plain old relax and rest.

When this type of new law passes, companies that were getting cold feet about bringing in new or re-hires should speed up the rate at which jobs come into the marketplace because double-time will simply not be economically viable. Besides, wouldn’t the government WANT more taxpayers on the “payroll” anyway? Not that I’m taking their side, it’s just logical.

The second obvious point to this subject should address those on salaries. Here is where we get into some grey areas. CEO’s making north of six  figures need not be concerned here, no doubt about that, but let’s face it, there are a LOT of those employed under so-called “salaries” that the math will play out to show they are approaching minimum wage; depending of course on just how many hours are being thrust upon them. I’ve been there myself and honestly, I’ll never go back. I LOVE to work, and in turn I enjoy the rewards of the hours I put in, but when I was on salary I had NO motivation to work past a “normal” 40 hour week. Why should I? The more I worked the more my value went down. So I say let’s start at the bottom of the scale and rise with some sort of fairness about it. Salaries can be a wonderful source of guaranteed income for some, but my experience shows me this “benefit” is abused more than enjoyed. Perhaps where this type of pay is suggested a pre-determined hourly amount would equal decent compensation only to a certain point, say 55 hours per week. Past this earmark the cost of the employee would rise as if he or she were hourly.  In any event, I’m pretty sure most would agree with me on this subject.

I’m sure being overworked (unless you really are doing something you love) is not how most would envision their futures. I also believe there is plenty of abundance to go around. My opinion says we should always be working towards finding those qualified to replace us so we can then be free to move up the food chain and learn how to replace those above our current pay grade. That’s just the way businesses grow.

If any of what you’ve read here sounds practical, please pass the word. Through the right channels those who have the proper leverage will begin to take action. Why? Because, by my hand, I declare there is no author attached to this idea; I let go completely, run with it all you want. If YOU would like to take credit for all this, please do so. I am more interested in the idea taking root than seeking “glory” for its materialization.

This is only the first of many ideas I will put out “there” for everyone. The next one will blow you away. Trust me……..

Please follow my blog, comment and share as you wish.

With Love and Compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood


Do you agree?


If so, I want this and the rest of these posts to go viral. Where’s the harm in asking? PLEASE share, PLEASE care, PLEASE let others be aware. I WANT FEEDBACK, I will acknowledge anything said with sincerity and kindness. Let’s begin discussions that REALLY will bring about action.


Contemplate this FACT for just a moment and you will see how little energy it takes to change things.


What a powerful truth this is, because once known, how difficult can it be to follow through? I intend to try, and I don’t even care if my name is attached to the final outcome. This journey we are on isn’t about fame, power, or wealth. It’s about “what if?” What if we stood as one and lived to help each other? What if we actually stopped fighting long enough to see our harmonious visions come to fruition? I intend to die supporting this philosophy.

Do you?

I do not see a world better off without people. We are miracles. We are the opposite of the entropic nature of the universe. We have the power of choosing unification over selfishness; each of us a part of the whole. We have the means to alter our destiny for the better. We can put aside petty differences fueled by false lines drawn in the earth.  We are not animals with pure instinct and we have the means to choose an evolved co-existence. We can come together for a better good. We can combine our resources, dreams, desires, and hopes to either step down into the abyss and be forgotten by time as Earth continues it’s voyage through the cosmos, or we can step up to the stratosphere and beyond in search of new meaning and resovle. I choose the latter.

How indeed do we find those causes that move us to our best destiny? What will fuel the next celebration be that unites us as a planet?

What I’ve attempted to lay out here are parameters for world changing incidents. Please feel free to ask me to alter the following in any way. This is a work in progress and therefore subject to addition or subtraction as you wish. I am completely open-minded; no ego in play what so ever.


First Observation- What world events have changed the planet for the better?

  • The man who stood in front of the tanks in China’s Tiananmen Square
  • The crucifixion.
  • Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat.
  • Nelson Mandela’s incarceration and subsequent release that led to the end of apartheid
  • Gandhi’s hunger strikes protesting British rule over India.
  • Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad.
  • July 20th, 1969.
  • The fall of the Berlin wall.
  • The discovery of penicillin.
  • The world-wide web potentially allowing an equal voice to almost everyone.

This next entry is a post I put on my other blog that represents to me just what we can accomplish in such a short amount of time.



  1. Indoor plumbing.
  2. Soap, bathing, deodorant, and a general acceptance toward a cleaner lifestyle.
  3. The 40 hour work week.
  4. We don’t gather in the town square and watch people get hung for lack of entertainment anymore.
  5. The accessibility to a highly educated and well informed life (past even the most scholarly of people) is literally lying in wait to be absorbed at libraries and the internet for FREE.
  6. Refrigeration. It has been suggested that this is the most important invention since the wheel. I agree.
  7. We as a world are recognizing more than ever the potential equality of every human.
  8. More people are working on more solutions for those who suffer than ever before.
  9. The ability for one voice to be heard around the world is easily within the grasp of those who seek it. All change throughout history has started this way, and now it can happen at the speed of light.
  10. Medical advancements have not only relieved hardship and misery from millions, the average life span has been extended so further progress in all areas of existence can be explored by those who survive.
  11. Radio, television, movies, and now the internet now brings to even the most remote regions of the world our capacity to express beauty, art, and our common threads in the form of music, imagery, and literature.
  12. The idea of freedom is the magnetic pull that seeks to unite all mankind. It expands daily and will not be stopped. Hope grows in the minds of those who never dared think it.
  13. Self-help, community support, and 12 step groups have given countless sufferers a path out of darkness that never previously existed.
  14. The electrifying of the planet has done more to bring comfort and convenience into our lives than almost anything else.
  15. The scientific community as a whole, from micro-technology to space travel, drives us to continued exploration of of our boundaries, both inside and out. These achievements perpetuate unity and purpose.
  16. We are finally recognizing we cannot continue exploiting our support system, a.k.a- the planet itself. “Saving the Earth” is NOT about whether or not it can overcome our abuse, it will. I’t’s about whether or not we will be on it when it eventually does. We are finally seeing we can only s**t  where we sleep so long.
  17. A largely unrecognized step in our recent evolution is the rise of humor. From visual media to literature, from stand-up comics to comic strips, we have embrace the desire to share and perpetuate laughter.
  18. Feats of engineering have improved almost everyone’s lives. Roads, buildings, heating and air conditioning, all forms of transportation, etc. are part of a better, more connected, world. The list is vast and continues to grow.
  19. Prejudice is waning and forgiveness is growing.The treatment of groups that were once trod upon for ethnic, political, spiritual, mental, and sexual issues reasons is slowly fading away. In return these groups are learning to release the hate they have expressed towards their oppressors and move on into lives of self-empowerment; dropping the need to blame or accuse current situations on past events.
  20. The beauty of our universe is being revealed in ways never before dreamed. The magnificence of this infinite painting that God has so eloquently created is beyond description. If united we can look upon this and realize just what a miracle it is even to do so, then perhaps we have a chance to grow beyond our differences and continue in peaceful coexistence.

Do I know there are circumstances in the world that need to be erased? Do I know the aforementioned conditions are not everywhere? Of course I do. The goal here is NOT to dwell on problems, but solutions. Please feel free to add to this list and make it grow. Focus on what is already good and getting better. This isn’t a wish list, it’s a recognition one. The dreams of today are the cradles of our children. May future generations have the hindsight to thank their ancestors better than we have.


Second Observation -What are the Common Threads?

  • Public (NOT protests, rallies….big difference; don’t fight against someone else’s agenda, stand up for your own. I.E.- don’t fight against violence, stand up for peace. This approach is an absolute must.)
  • Always passionate, focused, and unifying in nature.
  • Anger, hostility, and bitterness towards others is not allowed.
  • Large sacrifices are usually involved either before or eventually that consist mostly of time, patience, money and sometimes even life itself.
  • There always seems to be an underlying element of spirituality (not religion.)
  • The cause is usually about freedom, unification, or exploration (equality, independence, human rights, expression, or just plain old curiosity.)
  • People are drawn to the cause; there is magnetism to the message (the turn of the century labor strikes, civil rights, the hippie movement, etc.)
  • It makes good media.
  • It makes the “bad” guys look foolish. The more “they” try and stop progress, the more they put their own necks in the noose.

Now we simply “reverse engineer” the specifications mentioned above to find further experiences that fits the boundaries set up by previous events.

As this blog progresses WE will try to come up with some examples of what might help mankind within the “rules” set up above. I do not want to do this alone, surely there are others who feel as I do. Please send in suggestions, Some posts will be funny in nature, some serious, some will be slight, some extremely powerful, but I guarantee all will be entertaining. The goal here is to generate one post per month and we will see how it goes from there.

My first entry past this introduction will address the possibility of creating thousands of jobs in the United States all without hardly spending a dime. Everyone I’ve pitched this idea to has demanded I go public with it. Perhaps it will find traction here if you are willing help.

Ideas mean nothing without action. Dreamers gather seeds while visionaries plant gardens and recruit workers to tend them. Am I asking a lot? Yes, you better believe it. Stepping up to save this beautiful planet is not something that’s going to be easy, but in the long run won’t it be nice to know that this is where it started?

Please follow this blog. Comment and share as you wish

With Love and Compassion, Daniel Andrew Lockwood